A recent Wired article reported that 54% of longer posts on LinkedIn are generated by AI. Additionally, marketing-based AI assistants claim higher user engagement for AI generated content compared to human-generated content.

In interactions with several language models, a common estimate was that the tipping point for AI-generated content dominance on LinkedIn might be around 70%. However, this is viewed as a sliding scale. In a refined inquiry about the potential for human-generated content to diminish if AI content meets quality standards, one language model confirmed, “Yes, that’s exactly the point.”

I don’t know if that ultimately is good or bad but it does signal to me an era where we are engaging mostly with AI generated content and will have to search for truly human created content.